brief document critique

Student

Name:

Student

IDENTIFICATION:

APA

Quotation

of

Log

Article

(1):

Emery

LOS ANGELES,

Kang

M,

Shrier

I,

et

ing.

Risk

of

injury

affiliated

with

physique

checking

amongst

youth

ice cubes

hockey

players.

JAMA,

2010;

303(22):

2265-­‐2272.

doi:

10. 1001/jama. 2010. 755.

Aim

of

the

Study

(1):

To

observe

if

risk

of

harm

and

concussions

is

distinct

in

Peewee

hockey

in

leagues

that

have

body

contact

in contrast

to

institutions

that

perform

not.

Hypothesis

(1):

Institutions

with

human body

checking

for

peewee

have got

a

larger

risk

of

injury

and

risk

of

concussions

in comparison

to

associations

that

carry out

not

have

body

checking

until

bantam.

Independent

Varying

&

Dependent

Variable(s)

(2):

IV:

Human body

checking,

placement,

gender,

years

experience,

skill

level

DV:

Injuries

and

concussions

Potential

confounding

factors

(extraneous

variables)

(2):

Sum

of

online games

played

–

if

crew

went

even farther

in

time of year

to

championship

games

or

lost

early on

Intensity

of

practice

How

a

person

answered

questionnaire

–

in the event

the

person

was

‘tougher'

may

possess

ranked

accidents

lower

than

another

person

Instruments

employed

(2):

Approval

forms

Base

questionnaires

Regular

questionnaires/assessments

Harm

reports

Potential

for

tendency?

(2):

There

were

10-­‐drop

outs

but

each

drop

out

was

a

whole

team

basis

because

of

lack

of

access

to

a

specialist

or

trainer

leading

to

ability

to

drop

away

without

skewing

data

for

benefit

of

study.

Each

team

got

their

personal

therapist/trainer

who

conducted

the

questionnaires/injury

reports

leading

to

discrepancy

among

teams.

Trainers/therapists

were

just

their

when

a

week

so

minimal

injuries

might

not

include

been

documented

Type(s)

of

data

(1):

Nominal

–

gender

Time period

–

amount

of

accidents

Ordinal

–

self

questionnaires

Are

there

any

moral

concerns?

Is usually

consent

described?

(2):

Agreement

was

attain

from

every

player

and

a

parent/guardian

before

engaging

in

analyze

Study

received

ethical

expulsion

Does

not really

state

if

results

acquired

resulted

in

loss

of

playing

time

resulting

in

falsification

of

questionnaires